![Evidence of sub-arc mantle oxidation by sulphur and carbon](https://www.geochemicalperspectivesletters.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/GPL1713_abstract.jpg)
![Evidence of sub-arc mantle oxidation by sulphur and carbon](https://www.geochemicalperspectivesletters.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/GPL1713_abstract.jpg)
![Repulsion between calcite crystals and grain detachment during water–rock interaction](https://www.geochemicalperspectivesletters.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/GPL1714_abstract.jpg)
Repulsion between calcite crystals and grain detachment during water–rock interaction
Y. Levenson, S. Emmanuel 3 1714 27 September 2016 09 January 2017 31 January 2017 133 141 6 Next article >> 300 nm, that had undergone vertical change in topography between scans of at least 100 nm. The events were detected by subtracting the topography of the second...![Comment on “A cometary origin for atmospheric martian methane” by Fries by Fries et al., 2016](https://www.geochemicalperspectivesletters.org/wp-content/uploads/images/comment_and_reply-2.jpg)
Comment on “A cometary origin for atmospheric martian methane” by Fries by Fries et al., 2016
M.M.J. Crismani, N.M. Schneider, J.M.C. Plane 3 1715 27 June 2016 8 February 2017 18 February 2017 0 Next article >>Reply to Comment on “A cometary origin for martian atmospheric methane” by Crismani et al., 2017
M. Fries 3 1716 5 September 2016 8 February 2017 18 February 2017 0 Next article >><< Previous article Reply to Comment on “A cometary origin for martian atmospheric methane” by Crismani et al., 2017 M. Fries1 1NASA Johnson Space Center, Astromaterials...![Solar wind implantation supplied light volatiles during the first stage of Earth accretion](https://www.geochemicalperspectivesletters.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/GPL1718_abstract.jpg)